726966fdc0
Summary: My benchmarks have shown react-emotion to be faster than the current implementation of `styled`. For this reason, I am converting all styling to [emotion](https://emotion.sh). Benchmark results: {F136839093} The syntax is very similar between the two libraries. The main difference is that emotion only allows a single function for the whole style attribute, whereas the old implementation had functions for every style-attirbute. Before: ``` { color: props => props.color, fontSize: props => props.size, } ``` After: ``` props => ({ color: props.color, fontSize: props.size, }) ``` Reviewed By: jknoxville Differential Revision: D9479893 fbshipit-source-id: 2c39e4618f7e52ceacb67bbec8ae26114025723f
35 lines
743 B
JavaScript
35 lines
743 B
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* Copyright 2018-present Facebook.
|
|
* This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the
|
|
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
|
|
* @format
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import styled from '../styled/index.js';
|
|
import {colors} from './colors.js';
|
|
import {Component} from 'react';
|
|
import {shell} from 'electron';
|
|
|
|
const StyledLink = styled('span')({
|
|
color: colors.highlight,
|
|
'&:hover': {
|
|
cursor: 'pointer',
|
|
textDecoration: 'underline',
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
export default class Link extends Component<{
|
|
href: string,
|
|
children?: React$Node,
|
|
}> {
|
|
onClick = () => {
|
|
shell.openExternal(this.props.href);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
render() {
|
|
return (
|
|
<StyledLink onClick={this.onClick}>{this.props.children}</StyledLink>
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|